The natural right to privacy is a fundamental human right that government needs to respect.

The Connecticut Legal Roundtable unpacks a series of Supreme Court decisions extending privacy rights to the digital realm.

The post No Warrant, No Suspicion, No Problem: Flock and Border Cellphone Searches Excluded From 4th Amendment Rules appeared first on Reason Magazine.

In the bowels of a temporary stadium in Evanston, after securing a comfortable 34-14 Week 3 win over Northwestern, Dan Lanning held his 2025... We are just a few weeks out from the kickoff of Oregon ...

These libertarians with their prattling on about freedom and rights. They can be so tiresome. Please stop with the high dudgeon! Here’s an example of one such “freedom” person writing about open-ended ...

We close our series on the new Roberts Court and restoration of the Constitution’s original understanding with the issue most distant from the Framing: the rise of a new high-tech world. We now hold ...

The case arose from a 2019 armed robbery investigation where law enforcement obtained a “geofence warrant” directing Google to identify devices that were present within a defined geographic area ...

Companies offering generative AI chat technologies to consumers should consider what protections apply under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the federal Stored Communications Act ...

To participate fully in society, we are asked to surrender personal, identifying information to third parties. The disclosures range from telephone and bank records to e-mail and Internet accounts.

Log-in to bookmark & organize content - it's free! Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson discusses the 4th Amendment's provisions for privacy and for unreasonable searches and seizures during her confirmation ...

A federal district court in the Central District of California has ruled that police queries of automated license plate reader (ALPR) databases are not Fourth Amendment searches. The case is United ...